An Islamic Approach to the Relationship between a Mentor (Murabbi) and a Mentee (Mutarabbi)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Faculty Member of the Department of Educational Sciences, the Higher Education Complex of the Islamic Humanities, Al-Mustafa International University, Qom, Iran.

2 PhD student in Educational Sciences, Humanities Higher Education Complex, affiliated to the Al-Mustafa International University

10.30471/edu.2025.10469.2946

Abstract

Introduction and Objective: Relationship plays a vital role in human life. Through verbal and nonverbal signals from the environment, man shapes the system of thought, emotion, and behavior. This is also discussed concerning a murabbi (mentor) and a mutarabbi (mentee), insofar as the murabbi can guide the mutarabbi’s life and happiness. The relationship between the murabbi and the mutarabbi in scientific centers is not limited to the transfer of concepts and knowledge; in addition to scientific and informational issues, mutarabbis identify with the murabbi’s personality, traits, and behavioral characteristics. A positive murabbi-mutarabbi relationship is considered an essential social support that can help the mutarabbi in dealing with various issues. The relationship between teacher and student is of great significance in the educational process. The murabbi-mutarabbi relationship is a fundamental one between them. The most important goal of establishing such a relationship is to create change, guide, and educate the various cognitive, emotional, and behavioral aspects of the mutarabbi. The murabbi, who is responsible for teaching and guiding the mutarabbi, plays an important role in establishing and maintaining the relationship. He strives to establish more effective relationships with the mutarabbis in various ways, aiming to create desirable changes in them and develop their abilities and talents. This study aims to examine an Islamic approach to the relationship between the murabbi and the mutarabbi. To achieve the primary goal of the study, the following partial goals are examined:
1. The approaches and Patterns of the relationship between the murabbi and the mutarabbi;
2. The dimensions and components of the relationship between the murabbi and the mutarabbi in the mentioned approaches and patterns;
3. The dimensions and components of the relationship between the murabbi and the mutarabbi with an Islamic approach.
Method: The method of this study is descriptive, analytical and inferential. In this method, first, all the conditions and relationships are described and explained, and then the data are analyzed, and conclusions are drawn from it. The collection of existing materials is a document in which, first, the required data is collected from reliable sources, and then, the desired materials are extracted based on the questions, analyzed, and inferred. In response to the first and second questions, the desired materials have been further described using sources related to the patterns of the relationship between the murabbi and the mutarabbi; however, in response to the third question, in addition, the analytical and inferential method has been used to interpret and analyze the existing Islamic teachings about science and knowledge, the murabbi and the mutarabbi, and to implicitly infer the Islamic approach to the relationship the murabbi and the mutarabbi and its dimensions and components. Therefore, the information sources for this study include documents related to the topic and religious sources, which encompass a wide range of books, research, and academic papers.
Results: Responsibility and fair dealing with the mutarabbi constitute the principal axes of the Islamic approach. In comparison to the Leary communication model that revolves around dominance versus submissiveness and cooperation versus opposition, the Islamic approach emphasizes responsibility versus neglect and fair dealing with discriminatory behavior. Therefore, the primary concern of the murabbi is his responsibility and fair dealing with the mutarabbi. In addition, there are components in the Islamic approach that are against the eight types of murabbi behavior including leadership, helpful and friendly, understanding and friendly, based on giving freedom and responsibility, uncertain, dissatisfied, blaming, and serious behavior in the classroom in the behavioral model of interpersonal interaction of Wobbles et al. Just as in the behavioral model of Wobbles et al., some components are positive and some others are negative, these two types of categories are also considered in the Islamic approach. In addition, the components of leadership, support, understanding, and granting freedom and responsibility are common to both types of approaches. However, in the Islamic approach, there are positive components such as attention to the mutarabbi’s abilities and needs and loving behavior, as well as negative components such as lack of attention to the mutarabbi’s emotions and personality, lack of attention to material and spiritual needs, lack of care and supervision, and abusive behavior, which are not seen in the behavioral model of Wobbles et al. In contrast, the behavioral model of Wobbles et al. emphasizes negative components, including insecurity, dissatisfaction, blaming, and serious classroom behavior.
Discussion and Conclusion: In the Islamic approach, the murabbi deals with the mutarabbis in a manner that guides them within the framework of responsible and fair behavior, while also attending to their needs and abilities, and exhibiting helpful, understanding, and loving behavior. Furthermore, he avoids tolerance and indifference, and is not indifferent to their needs and emotions; he also refrains from showing offensive behavior. In addition, the murabbi establishes a strong relationship with them and has a loving, supportive, caring, educational, corrective, and disciplinary role. In this approach, the murabbi does not withhold any guidance from his mutarabbis, wants their well-being and happiness, respects them, and strives to honor their personality, without forcing them to rebel against the murabbi. The mutarabbi’s ability is one of the important axes of the model of relationship between the murabbi and the mutarabbi, because if the murabbi expects too much from the mutarabbi, the mutarabbi will become isolated and withdrawn due to his inability to meet these expectations and will suffer social and psychological damage. Additionally, a responsible murabbi should consider the diverse needs of the mutarabbi, including physical, psychological, mental, social, and spiritual aspects, and provide educational opportunities that cater to these needs, enabling the mutarabbi to develop into a well-rounded individual. In addition, observing justice and fairness is another central axis of the murabbi-mutarabbi relationship. Mutarabbis evaluate the murabbis’ interactions with their peers; if they perceive the murabbis’ behavior as fair or discriminatory, they learn from it and apply the same behavior in their dealings with others. In addition to the principal axes of the relationship between the murabbi and the mutarabbi that were examined, there are also components in this approach, the most essential desirable components being leadership, helpful and understanding behavior, behavior based on granting responsibility and freedom, loving behavior, and motivation. In contrast, a responsible murabbi avoids discriminatory behavior, insults, humiliation, and disregard for the mutarabbis’ needs. They respect the emotions and personality of their mutarabbis and monitor and supervise them throughout the entire educational process to ensure they do not slip, neglect, or deviate.

Keywords


  1. قرآن کریم، ترجمه فولادوند و مکارم شیرازی
  2. نهج‌البلاغه،ترجمه فیض‌الاسلامی. (1392ق). قم: جامعه مدرسین حوزه علمیه قم.
  3. اخوان الصفا. (1405ق). رسائل اخوان‌الصفا و خلان الوفاء. قم: مرکز نشر مکتب الاعلام الاسلامی.
  4. اکبری، ابوالقاسم. (1385). مشکات نوجوانی و جوانی. بی‌جا: نشر رشد و توسعه.
  5. امیری، حسین. (1387). «رابطه معلم و شاگرد و تاثیر آن بر بهداشت روانی کودکان». ماهنامه آموزشی تربیتی پیوند، شماره 342- ص 52.
  6. بازرگان، زهرا و ناهید صادقی. (1380). «بررسی رفتار میان فردی معلمان با دانش‌آموزان مدارس راهنمایی دخترانه تهران». مجله روان‌شناسی و علوم تربیتی، 31(2): 99-121.
  7. بحرانی، یوسف. (1416ق). الحدایق الناظره فی احکام العترۀ الطاهره. ج1و2، قم: موسسه نشر اسلامی.
  8. بخاری النجفی، محمد بن اسماعیل. (1401). الصحیح. بیروت: دارالفکر.
  9. برقی، احمد بن محمد. (1371). المحاسن. ج2، قم: دار الکتب الاسلامیه.
  10. بیابانگرد، اسماعیل. (1383). روانشناسی نوجوانان. قم: دفتر نشر فرهنگ اسلامی.
  11. تمیمی آمدی، عبدالواحد بن محمد. (1366). غررالحکم و دررالکلم. قم: دفتر تبلیغات حوزه علمیه.
  12. جمعی از نویسندگان. (بی‌تا). فرهنگ فلسفه و علوم اجتماعی. تهران: پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی.
  13. حرانی، حسن بن علی بن شعبه. (1400ق/1404). تحف‌العقول عن آل الرسول. تصحیح علی‌اکبر غفاری، قم: جامعه مدرسین.
  14. حرعاملی، محمد بن حسن. (1412ق). وسائل‌الشیعه. ج17، قم: موسسه آل‌البیت.
  15. حسینی‌زاده، سید علی. (1388). سیره تربیتی پیامبر و اهل بیتb. جلد اول، تربیت فرزند، قم: موسسه چاپ زیتون.
  16. سبحانی، جعفر. (1387). مربی نمونه (تفسیر سوره لقمان). قم: موسسه امام صادق.
  17. شعبانی، حسن. (1371). مهارت‌های آموزشی و پرورشی (روش‌ها و فنون تدریس). ج1، تهران: سمت.
  18. شهید ثانی، زین العابدین ابن علی. (1368). منیه المرید فی ادب المفید و المستفید. تحقیق رضا مختاری، قم: مرکز انتشارات دفتر تبلیغات اسلامی.
  19. عمید، حسن. (1375). فرهنگ عمید. تهران، امیرکبیر.
  20. غزالی، محمد بن محمد. (1364). احیا علوم‌الدین. ترجمه مرید الدین خوارزمی، تهران: انتشارات علمی فرهنگی.
  21. فرهنگی، علی اکبر. (1373). مبانی ارتباطات سازمانی. تهران تایمز.
  22. فعالی، محمدتقی. (1397). مبانی سبک زندگی اسلامی. تهران: موسسه آل‌یاسین، چ سوم.
  23. قرائتی، محسن. (1374). تفسیر نور. تهران: مرکز فرهنگی درس‌هایی از قرآن.
  24. کارآمد، حسین. (1397). درآمدی بر روش‌ها و فنون تدریس. قم: مرکز بین‌المللی ترجمه و نشر المصطفی.
  25. کلینی، محمد بن یعقوب. (1363). الکافی. تهران: دارالکتب الاسلامیه، چاپ پنجم.
  26. کوهساری، سمیه. (1396). «بررسی وضعیت سبک های تعاملی معلمان ریاضی با دانش‌آموزان، نشریه علمی پژوهشی - آموزش و ارزشیابی». 10(29): 13-28. دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ساری.
  27. مجلسی، محمدباقر. (1403ق). بحار الانوار. بیروت: موسسه الوفاء، چاپ دوم.
  28. مجلسی، محمدباقر. (1409ق). بحار الانوار. لدرر اخبار الائمه الاطهار، بیروت: دار الاضواء.
  29. محسنیان راد، مهدی. (1384). ارتباط شناسی: ارتباطات انسانی(میان فردی، گروهی، جمعی). چاپ ششم، تهران: سروش.
  30. محسنیان راد، مهدی. (1369). ارتباط شناسی: ارتباطات انسانی (میانفردی، گروهی، جمعی). چاپ اول، تهران: سروش.
  31. مسکویه، احمد بن محمد بن یعقوب. (1371). تهذیب الاخلاق و تطهیر الاغراق. قم: بیدار.
  32. مصباح یزدی، محمد تقی. (بی‌تا). مقاله مبانی و اصول عملی تربیت. قم: موسسه آموزشی -پژوهشی امام خمینی.
  33. نراقی، محمد مهدی. (بی‌تا). جامع السعادات. ج3، نجف: دارالنعمان للطباعه و النشر.
  34. نوری، حسین. (1408ق). مستدرک الوسایل...، قم: موسسه آل البیت.

 

References

  1. A group of authors (No date), Dictionary of Philosophy and Social Sciences , Tehran, Institute for Human Sciences Research. [in Persian]
  2. Akbari, Abolghasem, (2006), Problems of Adolescence and Youth, out of place, The publication of growth and development. [in Persian]
  3. Akhwan al-Safa, (1984), The Letters of Akhwan al-Safa and Khalan Al-Wafa, Qom, Publishing Center of the School of Islamic Studies. [in Persian]
  4. Amid, Hassan (1996), Amid Culture, Tehran, Amirkabir. [in Persian]
  5. Amiri, Hossein (2008), Teacher-student relationship and its impact on children's mental health, Peyvand Educational and Training Monthly, No. 342-343. [in Persian]
  6. Bahrani, Youssef (1995), al-Hadaiq al-Nazrah fi Ahkam al-Itrah al-Tahirah, vol.1 and 2, Qom, Islamic Publishing House. [in Persian]
  7. Barqi, Ahmad bin Muhammad (1993), Al-Mahasin, vol. 2, Qom, Dar al-Kutub al- [in Persian]
  8. Bazargan, Zahra, Nahid Sadeghi, (2001), Study of Interpersonal Behavior of Teachers with Students of Girls' Middle Schools in Tehran, Journal of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Year 31, No. 2, pp. 99-121, University of Tehran. [in Persian]
  9. Biyabangard, Ismail (2004), Adolescent Psychology, Qom, Islamic Culture Publishing House. [in Persian]
  10. Brekelmans, M., Sleegers, P., & Fraser, B. J. (2000). Teaching for active learning. In P. R. J. Simons, J. L. van der Linden, & T. Duffy (Eds.), New Learning (pp. 227-242). Dordrecht: Kluwer
  11. Bukhari al-Najafi, Muhammad bin Ismail (1401AH), al-Sahih, Beirut, Dar al-Fikr. [in Persian]
  12. Den Brok, P., Brekelmans, M., & Wubbels, T. (2004). Interpersonal teacher behavior and student outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 15, 407-
  13. Fa'ali, Mohammad Taqi (2018), Foundations of an Islamic Lifestyle , Third Edition, Tehran, Al-Yasin Institute. [in Persian]
  14. Farhangi, Ali Akbar (1994), Fundamentals of Organizational Communication, Tehran Times. [in Persian]
  15. Ghazali, Muhammad ibn Muhammad (1985), The Revival of the Sciences of the Faith, translated by Murid al-Din al-Khwarizmi, Tehran, Scientific and Cultural Publications. [in Persian]
  16. Har’Amili, Muhammad ibn Hassan (1991), Wasa’il al-Shi’ah, vol. 17, Qom, Aal al-Bayt Institute. [in Persian]
  17. Harrani, Hassan bin Ali bin Shaba (2004), Tahafu Al-'Uqul 'an Al-Rasul, edited by Ali Akbar Ghaffari, Qom, Jami'ah Mudarrisin. [in Persian]
  18. Hosseinizadeh, Seyyed Ali (2009), The Educational Life of the Prophet and Her Household (PBUH), Volume 1, Raising Children, Qom, Zeytoon Printing Institute. [in Persian]
  19. Karamad, Hossein (2018), An Introduction to Teaching Methods and Techniques, Qom, Al-Mustafa International Translation and Publishing Center. [in Persian]
  20. Kohsari, Somayeh (2017), Studying the status of interactive styles of mathematics teachers with students, Scientific Research Journal -Education and Evaluation, Year 10, Issue 29, Islamic Azad University of Sari. [in Persian]
  21. Kulayni, Muhammad ibn Yaqub (1984), Al-Kafi, Tehran Dar al-Kutub al-Islamiyya, fifth edition. [in Persian]
  22. Leary, T. (1957). An interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York: Ronald Press Company.
  23. Majlisi, Muhammad Baqir (1403 AH), Bihar al-Anwar, Beirut, Al-Wafa Institute, second edition. [in Persian]
  24. Majlisi, Muhammad Baqir (2009), Bihar al-Anwar li Durar Akhbar al-A'immat al-Athar , Beirut, Dar Al- [in Persian]
  25. Mesbah Yazdi, Mohammad Taghi, Bi Ta, article on the principles and practical principles of education, Qom, Imam Khomeini Educational and Research Institute. [in Persian]
  26. Miskawayh, Ahmad bin Muhammad bin Yaqoub (1371AH), Tahhib al-Akhlaq and Tathir al-Ighraq, Qom, Bidar. [in Persian]
  27. Mohsenian Rad, Mehdi (1990), Communicology: Human Communication (Interpersonal, Group, Mass), First Edition, Tehran, Sorush. [in Persian]
  28. Mohsenian-Rad, Mehdi (2005), Communication: Human Communication (Interpersonal, Group, Collective), 6th edition, Tehran, Soroush. [in Persian]
  29. Nahjul-Balagha, translated by Fayz al-Islam Bita, Qom, Qom Seminary Teachers' Association. [in Persian]
  30. Naraqi, Muhammad Mahdi (No date), Jame’ al-Saadat, vol. 3, Najaf, Dar al-Nu’man for Printing and Publishing. [in Persian]
  31. Nouri, Hussein (1987), Mustadrak al-.., Qom, Al-Al-Bayt Institute. [in Persian]
  32. Qaraati, Mohsen (1995), Interpretation of Noor, Tehran, Cultural Center for Lessons from the Quran. [in Persian]
  33. Shabani, Hasan (1992), Teaching and Educational Skills (Methods and Techniques of Teaching) , Vol. 1, Tehran, Samt. [in Persian]
  34. Shabani, Hassan (1992), Educational and Training Skills (Teaching Methods and Techniques), Vol. 1, Tehran, Samt. [in Persian]
  35. Shahid Thani, Zayn al-Abidin ibn Ali (1989), Muniya al-Mureed fi adab al-Mufid va al-Mustafid, researched by Reza Mokhtari, Qom, Islamic Propaganda Office Publications Center. [in Persian]
  36. Sobhani, Jafar (2008), Model Teacher (Explanation of Surah Luqman), Qom, Imam Sadiq Institute. [in Persian]
  37. Tamimi Amadi, Abdul Wahid bin Muhammad (1987), Ghurar al-Hikam and Durar al-Kalim, Qom, Seminary Propaganda Office. [in Persian]
  38. The Holy Quran, translated by Foladvand and Makarem Shirazi. [in Persian]
  39. Wubbels, T., & Brekelmans, M. (2005). Two decades of research on teacher-student relationships in class. International Journal of Educational Research, 43, 6-
  40. Wubbels, T., Creton, H. A., & Hooymayers, H. P. (1985). Discipline problems of beginning teachers, interactional teacher behaviour mapped out. Paper Presented at Annual Meeting American Education Research Association, Chicago, IL.
  41. Wubbles, T., Levy, J.A. (1991) “comparaison of Interpersonal Behavior of Dutch and American teachers”. International Joumal of Interculrural Relation, Vol.15, pp. 1-